CBL Blamed for Increment in Forex Rate

first_imgAssistant Secretary General of the National Foreign Exchange Bureau of Liberia (NAFIBOL), Nimely Saye, frowns on the CBL’s continuous failure to address the exchange rate issue on the Liberian market. But Ex SG of Money Changers Association Blames Supply and DemandThe assistant secretary general of the National Foreign Exchange Bureau of Liberia (NAFIBOL), Nimely Saye, has blamed the Central Bank of Liberia (CBL) for the high increase in the US-Liberian dollar exchange rate on the Liberian market, because of its inability to regulate the forex market.Saye made the remarks yesterday in an exclusive interview with the Daily Observer at his forex bureau on Broad Street, when he indicated that the supervision and regulations department at the CBL has failed to work in the interest of legal foreign exchangers, thereby leaving the market open.He said if the CBL does not put the situation under control now, the exchange rate would reach L$150 to US$1 by July, “because of the current open market situation.”Saye, who has been in the forex business for over 15 years, indicated that the situation continues to hamper legal exchangers in paying their taxes, rent, salaries, and other fees.He said despite a series of meetings with authorities of the bank to intervene in the ongoing situation on the Liberian market, they (bank authorities) appear unmoved by their concerns.“We are not benefiting under Governor Milton A. Weeks’ administration, because there are many illegal foreign exchangers in the various street corners that are changing at their own rate, including cement depots, gas stations, rice depots, supermarkets, and stores thereby hampering the legal forex business,” Saye said.According to him, the protection of legal exchangers by the Central Bank of Liberia can easily stabilize the exchange rate on the market in the shortest possible time.He said, “We had a blissful time with the Dr. J. Mills Jones administration, because of his ability to listen and willingness to work with the legal bureaus and the association.“This led to a stable rate on the Liberian market that would last for three to four months consistently without any daily or weekly increment, from L$88, 89, and 90 to US$1.”According to him, there are many illegal forex businesses than legal ones which, he said, deserves serious attention by the government, particularly the CBL, adding, “We have only 103 registered bureaus across the country.”“The CBL takes seven to eight months nowadays before coming to get rid of illegal foreign exchangers. The bank needs to get rid of them on the market or press on them to legalize their status and operate under CBL regulations.“Everyone is changing money without any restriction, which has a serious consequence on the economy and the country. We are the middlemen between the commercial bank, Central Bank, and business people, but we are not given the opportunity to play our role well,” he said.Saye said commercial banks, cement depots, gas stations, and rice depots do not have the right to engage in the money exchange business due to the lack of license from the CBL, but they nonetheless continue to do such a business, which is currently affecting the country.He said the association is confident that the Weah administration will work to have the situation addressed, stating, “We can only get a better result in the country and the economy if the CBL takes action against illegal forex businesses.”Saye called on President George Weah to issue an Executive Order, which he believes will help to reduce or stabilize the exchange rate and also ensure that those who are not licensed to operate as money exchangers in the country are barred from doing so.“We all observed that few hours to President Weah’s State of the Nation Address, the rate dropped because money exchangers didn’t have money. If the business people hold on to their money, it will be a serious problem,” he stated.“In 1999, the Central Bank of Liberia enacted a law establishing the Foreign Exchange Bureau and since the act was created, we have been protected according to the laws.”However the first secretary general of the Liberia Money Changers Association, Mr. Idrissa Kaba has objected to the claim that the CBL is responsible for the high exchange rate of the Liberian dollar to the US dollar.“Every student of economics,” Kaba said, “will realize that what is happening between the US dollar and the Liberian dollar is the issue of supply and demand and not because there are what someone will describe as ‘illegal money changers’ in the country.”Kaba said “The supply of the US dollar is lower than that of the Liberian dollar on the market and that is the reason the demand for the US dollar has affected the Liberian dollar.” He added that if the Liberian government can provide dollars to all major foreign businesses, including the huge supermarkets, Club Beer, Coco Cola, CEMENCO, among others, the pressure would naturally reduce on the Liberian dollar and it will normalize the exchange rate.Central Bank of Liberia in a release issued by Mr. Cyrus Wleh Badio, Head of Corporate Communications, said yesterday that despite an end-of-year press conference on December 21, 2017 on the state of the Liberian economy, stories still linger about alleged illegal capital transfers. These stories linger because the statistics that the Central Bank of Liberia (CBL) has released have been taken out of context and/or simply misunderstood.“It is therefore important, that the CBL clarifies these stories to prevent speculations that have the propensity to undermine the credibility and stability of the financial sector and by extension present wrong signals to the public including our development partners, current and potential investors, among others.“During the December 2017 Press Conference, the CBL disclosed that between November 2016 and October 2017, outward personal remittances amounted to US$449.41 million while during that same period, Liberia received US$545.78 million in inward personal remittance, representing a net gain of US$96.37 million.“The US$449 million mentioned comprised all transfers in cash made by residents to non-residents and transfers between resident and non-resident individuals on one hand. On the other hand, it also comprised transfers of income of border, seasonal, and other short-term workers who are employed in the economy where they are not resident. It is the total of all monies remitted through Western Union, MoneyGram, Ria (another money transfer operator) and via SWIFT1 by individuals and/or businesses to the rest of the world.“Furthermore, reporting that there was US$449.41 in outward personal remittance in 2017 does not in any way suggest that the money was transmitted directly from the CBL or transmitted to unidentified foreign accounts. The CBL wishes to emphasize that the sources of the monies that were remitted were not from the Central Bank of Liberia. In addition, nowhere in the CBL publication does the issue of unidentified foreign accounts arise.“For the calendar year 2017 (i.e. January-December, 2017), provisional statistics show that the total outflows of personal remittances amounted to US$445.3 million. Of this amount, about 31.5 percent was transferred through Money Transfer Operators (i.e. Western Union, MoneyGram, and RIA) while the remaining 68.5 percent were through banks using SWIFT. Most of the SWIFT transactions (which constituted 68.5 percent of the total outflows) were carried out by businesses engaged in construction activities, rice and frozen food importation, auto parts, supermarkets and trading businesses, among others.“Over the last 2 years, preceding the elections period, the total outflows of personal remittances grew from US$293.4 million in 2015 to US$304.6 million in 2016. The growth in total outflow in 2017 largely reflects responses within the economy to uncertainty that may have been associated with the then impending elections. Where there is uncertainty, there will be outflow of funds. It is important, however, to once again emphasize that the total outflow of remittances mentioned is an aggregate of personal remittances from various sources and NOT transfers made by officials of Government or to unknown accounts as is being wrongly perceived.“The Central Bank of Liberia welcomes public scrutiny, especially from the media, but this must be done in good faith,” the statement said.Share this:Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)last_img read more

Read More

Can LowIncome Buyers Overcome the Down Payment Hurdle

first_img Share January 26, 2018 729 Views Can Low-Income Buyers Overcome the Down Payment Hurdle? Do all homebuyers need a lot of skin in the game? That’s a question the Urban Institute asked, trying to find out whether buyers really need a large downpayment to buy a house.Turns out, the answer is, maybe not. A new Urban Institute study of New Mexico-based homeownership support nonprofit Homewise suggests there could be an alternative‒‒and sustainable‒‒way to buy even if the buyer doesn’t have a large downpayment at the ready.For sure, the study states, low- and moderate- income households still need adequate savings, low levels of debt, good creditworthiness, and a steady source of income if they want to move from renting to buying. But the Homewise model, seems to fly in the face of mortgage logic. Or at least mortgage expectations.The model works like this: Homewise offered two mortgage packages, for 80 and 18 percent of a home’s value, respectively. The agency then resells the higher mortgage on the secondary market to raise capital for additional clients. But it holds on to the riskier second mortgage so that the client pays only a 2 percent down payment, while still eliminating the need for mortgage insurance. The agency services both loans, to monitor loan performance on each and intervene early if there is a problem.Where the approach counters the expected is, keeping the riskier loan is not causing problems for Homewise. The study found that  the “riskier” borrowers pay their loans just as well as anyone else; maybe better.“They actually have lower delinquency rates than similar households buying apart from the program,” the Urban Institute stated.By the numbers, the study found that Homewise clients have “6.3 fewer 30-day delinquencies, 2.3 fewer 60-day delinquencies, 1.8 fewer 90-day delinquencies, and 1.1 fewer 180-day delinquencies in the first two years of their mortgage than a matched comparison group of purchasers.”The Urban Institute stated that the reason for the lower delinquencies at Homewise is most likely due to the fact that the company doesn’t pick fights it can’t win. In other words, Homewise makes it a point to fit homes to budgets, without the additional monthly costs of private mortgage insurance.“The terms of the loans provided by Homewise are preferable to the terms of the piggyback loans that were common during the housing bubble,” the study reported. “Those loans usually required an 80-10-10 split rather than the 80-18-2 split (which Homewise provides), and they often required the purchaser to pay closing costs on both loans.”This, the report stated, means Homewise eliminates the need to pay double for things like origination fees and any other fees the lender charged.Another key reason the model seems to work well, the report stated, is that Homewise “also provides counseling, homebuyer education, real estate development, real estate sales, mortgage origination, and loan servicing, as well as an in-house incentivized savings program.The Institute sees the Homewise model as “an opportunity to break the wealth gap cycle” in home purchases. It also sees it as a way to reduce the race gap in homeownership.Compared to white buyers, black homebuyers in particular tend to have less wealth, according to a Stanford University study. That typically means lower credit scores as well. But the Urban Institute stated that the Homewise model could be a bridge to homeownership for families traditionally marginalized by the mortgage industry.center_img in Daily Dose, Featured, News, Origination Homewise low-income buyers mortgage Urban Institute 2018-01-26 ScottMorgan1last_img read more

Read More